Information obligations even for pseudonymised data?
The ECJ rules on whether recipients must also be named if they only receive pseudonymised personal data. The ruling is likely to spark considerable debate.
At activeMind.legal, Martin Röleke advises clients across all industries in the areas of data protection and information security law.
His consulting focus lies in particular on the interface of data protection and IT security. He primarily advises on various data protection compliance requirements in the area of health care, where he provides support for research and complex outsourcing projects, among other areas.
The ECJ rules on whether recipients must also be named if they only receive pseudonymised personal data. The ruling is likely to spark considerable debate.
The General Court of the European Union rules on the validity of the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, providing legal certainty for data transfers to the United States, at least in the short term.
The CJEU rules on the concept of processing and the objectives of the GDPR.
The EU’s regulation of artificial intelligence – a brief overview of the AI systems covered and the corresponding obligations of the involved companies.
The Hamburg Regional Court clarifies key questions regarding the processing of personal data in online shops – at least for some providers.
The European General Data Protection Regulation and the AI Act are similar in many respects, but also have some important differences that companies should be aware of.
Subscribe to our free newsletter: